Comments on: PageRank Sharing SEO Tactics

By: Seo Company India

Seo Company India — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:29:52 +0000

Thanks for this nice article. I was realy confuse about page rank . now it’s clear. Thanks Djames

By: Thanks!

Thanks! — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:14:10 +0000

great info….you have no idea the amount that its helped

By: Djames

Djames — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:47:51 +0000

“Using the title attribute in a link doesn’t mean much either. The potential for spamming is to high. It will be discarded if it hasn’t already just like the alt tag in images for seo reasons. I use both because they should be used for basic usability and offer very little SEO credit. A couple years ago the story may have been different. ”

Ya it doesn’t mean much, but it’s still good practice to use, and carries some weight, but very small. The strongest SEO of the link is whats written between the anchor tag such as a href=”link”>Information here<

By: Djames

Djames — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:44:55 +0000

Ya I thought about the relevance to, but then I started analyzing how the pagerank was shared.

A good example is http://ultimatetaxi.com/pics/aspen.htm

If you look at the links, before 2007 (this hasn’t been updated yet in google pagerank), you will notice that only pages with a hyperlink to them with corresponding meta keywords in it get pagerank shared to them. There are are about 4 or 5 on the entire list of links that have developed their own page rank, but it’s lower number than the ones that have borrowed the pagerank. But the hyperlink titles that do not have a keyword used in it, there is no pagerank sharing.

I have witnessed this on other websites, and the only conclusion I have been able to draw is that pagerank will be shared with hyperlinks and title text, that matches the keywords in the html meta data.

By: Chris "disagrees with meta tag usefulness"

Chris "disagrees with meta tag usefulness" — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:42:39 +0000

I am going to have to disagree. I do not have any basis besides just a knee jerk reaction and not believing there is any correlation to the link and the meta tags.

The point is link relevancy. The link’s relevancy is drawn from the content. If the site is about world travel and it links to a an airline page that is relevant.

Choosing relevant anchor text to the page landed is the most important factor. The difference between “SEO Traffic Tips and Tweaks or you could do News in Laymen terms” is huge. They are different topics all together and aren’t relevant to the page being pointed too.

Using the title attribute in a link doesn’t mean much either. The potential for spamming is to high. It will be discarded if it hasn’t already just like the alt tag in images for seo reasons. I use both because they should be used for basic usability and offer very little SEO credit. A couple years ago the story may have been different.