<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PageRank Sharing SEO Tactics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/</link>
	<description>Blogging, Tweaks, SEO, Optimizing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arsh SEO</title>
		<link>http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Arsh SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 07:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/#comment-73</guid>
		<description>hi,
   Great dear this information is really good and informative. it is very latest information thanks.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://exploretheseoworld.blogspot.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Explore The SEO world &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,</p>
<p>   Great dear this information is really good and informative. it is very latest information thanks.<br />
<a href="http://exploretheseoworld.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">Explore The SEO world </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo Company India</title>
		<link>http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo Company India</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 14:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this nice article. I was realy confuse about page rank . now it&#039;s clear. Thanks Djames :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this nice article. I was realy confuse about page rank . now it&#8217;s clear. Thanks Djames <img src='http://howbits.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanks!</title>
		<link>http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanks!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>great info....you have no idea the amount that its helped</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great info&#8230;.you have no idea the amount that its helped</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djames</title>
		<link>http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Djames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/#comment-68</guid>
		<description>&quot;Using the title attribute in a link doesn’t mean much either. The potential for spamming is to high. It will be discarded if it hasn’t already just like the alt tag in images for seo reasons. I use both because they should be used for basic usability and offer very little SEO credit. A couple years ago the story may have been different. &quot;
Ya it doesn&#039;t mean much, but it&#039;s still good practice to use, and carries some weight, but very small. The strongest SEO of the link is whats written between the anchor tag such as a href=&quot;link&quot;&gt;Information here&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Using the title attribute in a link doesn’t mean much either. The potential for spamming is to high. It will be discarded if it hasn’t already just like the alt tag in images for seo reasons. I use both because they should be used for basic usability and offer very little SEO credit. A couple years ago the story may have been different. &#8221;</p>
<p>Ya it doesn&#8217;t mean much, but it&#8217;s still good practice to use, and carries some weight, but very small. The strongest SEO of the link is whats written between the anchor tag such as a href=&#8221;link&#8221;>Information here<</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djames</title>
		<link>http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Djames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 06:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Ya I thought about the relevance to, but then I started analyzing how the pagerank was shared.
A good example is &lt;a href=&quot;http://ultimatetaxi.com/pics/aspen.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://ultimatetaxi.com/pics/aspen.htm&lt;/a&gt;
If you look at the links, before 2007 (this hasn&#039;t been updated yet in google pagerank), you will notice that only pages with a hyperlink to them with corresponding meta keywords in it get pagerank shared to them. There are are about 4 or 5 on the entire list of links that have developed their own page rank, but it&#039;s lower number than the ones that have borrowed the pagerank. But the hyperlink titles that do not have a keyword used in it, there is no  pagerank sharing.
I have witnessed this on other websites, and the only conclusion I have been able to draw is that pagerank will be shared with hyperlinks and title text, that matches the keywords in the html meta data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya I thought about the relevance to, but then I started analyzing how the pagerank was shared.</p>
<p>A good example is <a href="http://ultimatetaxi.com/pics/aspen.htm" rel="nofollow">http://ultimatetaxi.com/pics/aspen.htm</a></p>
<p>If you look at the links, before 2007 (this hasn&#8217;t been updated yet in google pagerank), you will notice that only pages with a hyperlink to them with corresponding meta keywords in it get pagerank shared to them. There are are about 4 or 5 on the entire list of links that have developed their own page rank, but it&#8217;s lower number than the ones that have borrowed the pagerank. But the hyperlink titles that do not have a keyword used in it, there is no  pagerank sharing.</p>
<p>I have witnessed this on other websites, and the only conclusion I have been able to draw is that pagerank will be shared with hyperlinks and title text, that matches the keywords in the html meta data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris "disagrees with meta tag usefulness"</title>
		<link>http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris "disagrees with meta tag usefulness"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://howbits.com/pagerank-sharing-seo-tactics/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>I am going to have to disagree.  I do not have any basis besides just a knee jerk reaction and not believing there is any correlation to the link and the meta tags.
The point is link relevancy. The link&#039;s relevancy is drawn from the content.  If the site is about world travel and it links to a an airline page that is relevant.
Choosing relevant anchor text to the page landed is the most important factor.  The difference between &quot;SEO Traffic Tips and Tweaks   or you could do   News in Laymen terms&quot;  is huge.    They are different topics all together and aren&#039;t relevant to the page being pointed too.
Using the title attribute in a link doesn&#039;t mean much either.  The potential for spamming is to high.  It will be discarded if it hasn&#039;t already just like the alt tag in images for seo reasons.  I use both because they should be used for basic usability and offer very little SEO credit.  A couple years ago the story may have been different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to have to disagree.  I do not have any basis besides just a knee jerk reaction and not believing there is any correlation to the link and the meta tags.</p>
<p>The point is link relevancy. The link&#8217;s relevancy is drawn from the content.  If the site is about world travel and it links to a an airline page that is relevant.</p>
<p>Choosing relevant anchor text to the page landed is the most important factor.  The difference between &#8220;SEO Traffic Tips and Tweaks   or you could do   News in Laymen terms&#8221;  is huge.    They are different topics all together and aren&#8217;t relevant to the page being pointed too.</p>
<p>Using the title attribute in a link doesn&#8217;t mean much either.  The potential for spamming is to high.  It will be discarded if it hasn&#8217;t already just like the alt tag in images for seo reasons.  I use both because they should be used for basic usability and offer very little SEO credit.  A couple years ago the story may have been different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
